Blauwe chi stijltang
De blauwe Krullen maken heb. Vind stijltang chi op - voor iedereen een voordeel. Al jarenlang wilde ik graag een Chi stijltang kopen, echter kwam het er steeds niet van. Ik had al een stijltang of ik kreeg een nieuwe voor kerst. Hbb24 heeft een uitgebreid assortiment chi haarverzorgingsproducten. Voor.00 uur besteld, morgen in huis. ' granny is hot!alleen waanzinnige steile. Maar m'n haar werd er uiteindelijk heel droog van. Mmaar had niet door dat het van die stijltang kwam.
Bij de chi g2 stijltang (de beste stijltang vind ik dus) ben je ervan verzekerd dat de tang snel op temperatuur. Je kan de chi g2 Ceramic & Titanium stijltang ook. Vind je het leuk om foto's te maken? Dan is dit super schattige shirt voor jou! Op de voorkant van dit blauwe t-shirt van het met d-rak staat een foto van. Bekijk ons compleet assortiment chi stijltangen display op /c-2696483/chi-stijltang/ meer ideeën over Ijzer, topaas. Welke stijltang is het beste? Waar moet je beginnen bij je zoektocht naar een stijltang? Er zijn zoveel stijltangen op de markt dat je door de bomen. The latest Tweets from m stijltang).
Wat is de beste stijltang?
Gebruikt functionele, analytische en tracking cookies (en daarmee vergelijkbare technieken) om jouw ervaring op onze website te anti verbeteren en om je van relevante advertenties te voorzien. Ook derde partijen kunnen cookies en vergelijkbare technieken plaatsen om jouw internetgedrag te volgen en je gepersonaliseerde advertenties te tonen binnen en/of buiten onze website. Door op cookies accepteren te klikken, ga je hiermee akkoord. Klik hier voor meer informatie.
Chi, stijltangen - m, chi, stijltang kopen
Gender recognition has also already been applied to Tweets. (2010) examined various traits of authors from India tweeting in English, combining character N-grams and sociolinguistic features like manner of laughing, honorifics, and smiley use. With lexical N-grams, they reached an accuracy.7, which the combination with the sociolinguistic features increased.33. (2011) attempted to recognize gender in tweets from a whole set of languages, using word and character N-grams as features for machine learning with Support Vector Machines (svm naive bayes and Balanced Winnow2. Their highest score when using just text features was.5, testing on all the tweets by each author (with a train set.3 million tweets and a test set of about 418,000 tweets). 2 Fink. (2012) used svmlight to classify gender on Nigerian twitter accounts, with tweets in English, with a minimum of 50 tweets. Their features were hash tags, token unigrams and psychometric measurements provided by the linguistic Inquiry of Word count software (liwc; (Pennebaker. Although liwc appears a very interesting addition, it hardly adds anything to the classification.
For each blogger, metadata is present, including the blogger s self-provided gender, age, industry and astrological sign. This corpus has been used extensively since. The creators themselves used it for various classification tasks, including gender recognition (Koppel. They report an overall accuracy.1. Slightly more information seems to be surinaamse coming from content (75.1 accuracy) than from style programs (72.0 accuracy). However, even style appears to mirror content.
We see the women focusing on personal matters, leading to important content words like love and boyfriend, and important style words like i and other personal pronouns. The men, on the other hand, seem to be more interested in computers, leading to important content words like software and game, and correspondingly more determiners and prepositions. One gets the impression that gender recognition is more sociological than linguistic, showing what women and men were blogging about back in A later study (Goswami. 2009) managed to increase the gender recognition quality.2, using sentence length, 35 non-dictionary words, and 52 slang words. The authors do not report the set of slang words, but the non-dictionary words appear to be more related to style than to content, showing that purely linguistic behaviour can contribute information for gender recognition as well.
Chi stijltang versus voordelige action tang
(2012) show that authorship recognition is also possible (to some degree) if the number of candidate authors is as high as 100,000 (as compared to the usually less than ten in naar traditional studies). Even so, there are circumstances where outright recognition is not an option, but where one must be content with profiling,. The identification of author traits like gender, age and geographical background. In this paper we restrict ourselves to gender recognition, and it is also this aspect we will discuss further in this section. A group which is very active in studying gender recognition (among other traits) on the basis of text is that around Moshe koppel. In (Koppel. 2002) they report gender recognition on formal written texts taken from the British National Corpus (and also give a good overview of previous work reaching about 80 correct attributions using function words and parts of speech. Later, in 2004, the group collected a blog Authorship Corpus (BAC; (Schler. 2006 containing adset about 700,000 posts to m (in total about 140 million words) by almost 20,000 bloggers.
Chi stijltang versus voordelige action tang, proxy Unblocker
In the following sections, we first present some previous work on gender recognition (Section 2). Then we describe our experimental data and the evaluation method (Section 3 after which we proceed to describe the various author profiling strategies that we investigated (Section 4). Then follow the results (Section 5 and Section 6 concludes the paper. For whom we already know that they are an individual person rather than, say, a husband and wife couple or a board of editors for an official Twitterfeed. C 2014 van Halteren and Speerstra. Gender Recognition Gender recognition is a subtask in the general field of authorship recognition and profiling, which has reached maturity in the last decades(for haar an overview, see. (Juola 2008) and (Koppel. Currently the field is getting an impulse for further development now that vast data sets of user generated data is becoming available.
The resource would become even more useful if we could deduce complete and right correct metadata from the various available information sources, such as the provided metadata, user relations, profile photos, and the text of the tweets. In this paper, we start modestly, by attempting to derive just the gender of the authors 1 automatically, purely on the basis of the content of their tweets, using author profiling techniques. For our experiment, we selected 600 authors for whom we were able to determine with a high degree of certainty a) that they were human individuals and b) what gender they were. We then experimented with several author profiling techniques, namely support Vector Regression (as provided by libsvm; (Chang and Lin 2011 linguistic Profiling (LP; (van Halteren 2004 and timbl (Daelemans. 2004 with and without preprocessing the input vectors with Principal Component Analysis (PCA; (Pearson 1901 (Hotelling 1933). We also varied the recognition features provided to the techniques, using both character and token n-grams. For all techniques and features, we ran the same 5-fold cross-validation experiments in order to determine how well they could be used to distinguish between male and female authors of tweets.
Chi stijltang versus ghd stijltang
1 Computational Linguistics in the netherlands journal 4 (2014) Submitted 06/2014; Published 12/2014 Gender Recognition on Dutch Tweets Hans van Halteren Nander Speerstra radboud University nijmegen, cls, linguistics Abstract In this paper, we investigate gender recognition on Dutch Twitter material, using a corpus consisting. We achieved the best results,.5 correct assignment in a 5-fold cross-validation on our corpus, with Support Vector Regression on all token unigrams. Two other machine learning systems, linguistic Profiling and timbl, come close to this result, at least when the input is first preprocessed with pca. Introduction In the netherlands, we have a rather unique resource in the form of the Twinl data set: a daily updated collection gouden that probably contains at least 30 of the dutch public tweet production since 2011 (Tjong Kim Sang and van den Bosch 2013). However, as any collection that is harvested automatically, its usability is reduced by a lack of reliable metadata. In this case, the Twitter profiles of the authors are available, but these consist of freeform text rather than fixed information fields. And, obviously, it is unknown to which degree the information that is present is true.